Bootstrapping a Unicorn: Day 2 Essay

Problem Before Product

The first coach education course I took taught Preview, Review, Thank You. Good lesson structure. Preview what you will work on. Execute the lesson. Review what was accomplished. Thank the player at the end. The method is clean. It produces consistent lessons. It also trains you to execute a plan before understanding what problem you are solving.

I watched this pattern reproduce itself for decades. Coaches follow the structure. They deliver technically sound lessons. Players improve in practice but collapse in matches. Parents see their kid fine during drills then unraveling under pressure. They know something is wrong but cannot name it. The coach keeps refining technique. The player keeps losing to people they could beat.

The system taught us to deliver lessons. It did not teach us to discover problems.

I am building Court 4 because I kept watching this pattern destroy potential. Parents would tell me their kid was fine at practice but fell apart in competition. They felt something was wrong but had no language for it. I kept showing them data about footwork and shot selection. They kept trying to describe something else. An invisible pressure. A collapse before the point even started.

I was solving the wrong problem.

When I started writing about measuring mental toughness, parents responded immediately. The words unlocked something. They could finally name what they were seeing. That response was not validation. It was evidence. The engagement was stronger than anything else I had written. That told me I had been close to the problem without actually solving it. The data was accurate. The question was wrong.

Day Two is about learning to ask better questions.

Ash Maurya calls it the Problem Interview but the label does not matter. The discipline is the same. You ask what hurts. You ask how often. You ask what they do now to manage it. When did you last feel it? Then you stop talking. The silence teaches you more than the answers. Each story gives you words you did not have before. Without those words, everything you build sounds like a foreign language to the people who need it.

Steve Blank says the founder's job is to leave the building. He is talking about proximity. Most of what matters is not said in meetings. It shows up in how people behave when nobody is keeping score. Walk the courts. Sit with the parents between matches. Watch how players warm up. Listen to how coaches explain losses. The closer you are to the source of the problem, the less theory you need.

I learned this the hard way. When I first conceived Court 4 I thought it was a technology problem. I needed better video analysis. Better frameworks for tracking performance. What I actually needed was to sit with parents for 30 minutes after their kids lost and just listen. Listening reframed what the technology needed to measure. That is how the solving began.

Teresa Torres argues that discovery cannot be a phase. It has to be a posture. The founder who only listens when things break will always be fixing yesterday's problem. Curiosity must be systematic or it dies under pressure. In Court 4, the system is built into the environment. Video captures performance. Sessions get recorded. Players reflect on what happened. The structure preserves the discipline of listening even when I am not there. We only learn what we are allowed to see. Visibility follows consent.

But here is the trap. The structure can become the goal.

I can feel this happening. Reflection feels like progress. Conversations feel like validation. Each insight makes me think I am closer to solving The Alcott Dilemma when I might just be admiring the problem from a new angle. Temple School Notebook sharpened my lens. Bootstrapping a Unicorn is supposed to teach me how to build. If all I do is learn better ways to reflect, I have substituted awareness for accomplishment.

Clayton Christensen helps here. He argues that people do not buy products. They hire them to make progress. That reframes everything. Parents do not hire training programs to improve rankings. They hire them to reduce anxiety and restore confidence. They are solving an emotional coordination problem inside their family. Less conflict after matches. Faster recovery from losses. A kid who can serve without shaking. When you see the job clearly, your design priorities change. You stop selling drills. You start engineering relief.

The test is whether listening changes what you build. It shows in how quickly a player regulates after losing a point. How often parents report post-match conflict. Whether the kid can name what they felt before the mistake.

Court 4 and Founders' Room together form a listening circuit. Court 4 makes experience visible. Founders' Room turns experience into meaning. Data from the court flows into conversation. Insight flows back into the next session as adjusted design. The loop never ends. Each cycle teaches both the human and the system how to see more clearly.

That feedback is what I call Communiplasticity. A learning system that reshapes itself through the act of teaching. But only if the teaching produces different action. Only if the insight bends back toward solving real problems for real people.

Day Two is where humility stops being a virtue and becomes a skill. Listening is not intellectual. It is physiological. It slows your pulse. It quiets the reflex to perform. You stay present long enough for the real problem to surface. Sometimes the customer cannot name it. Sometimes they ask for one thing when the truth hides under another. The craft is in the patience to let patterns show themselves before you rush to interpret them.

The world is not waiting for your brilliance. It is waiting to be understood.

Founders who mistake invention for empathy will always build faster than they learn. The ones who listen long enough earn permission to build at all. Problem Before Product is not the pause before building. It is the building. The product starts taking shape the moment you learn to hear what the world is actually saying.

Every question asked in good faith is a prototype. Every observation tests empathy. The work is not to eliminate uncertainty but to inhabit it long enough for truth to reveal its structure.

Only then can real architecture begin.

Duey Evans
Performance Architect | Founder, Communiplasticity Solutions
📧 [email protected] 
📞 469.955.DUEY (3839)
🌐 theperformancearchitect.com 
🔗 Connect on LinkedIn